Acknowledgments |
Preface |
The Riddle of Nuclear Waste / 1: |
The Status Quo: Promoting Permanent Disposal |
The Mistakes of the Past |
Summary and Overview |
Understanding the Origins of the Problem / 2: |
Radioactive Waste: Technical Background |
Radioactive Waste: Historical Background |
The Current Status of High-Level Radioactive Waste |
Radioactive Waste: Legal and Regulatory Background |
Conclusion |
Reliance on Value Judgments in Repository Risk Assessment / 3: |
Science and Methodological Value Judgments |
Quantitative Risk Assessment and Value Judgments |
Value Judgments in Estimating Risks |
Value Judgments in Evaluating Risks |
Subjective Estimates of Repository Risks / 4: |
Repository Risk Estimates Rely on Questionable Value Judgments |
Value Judgments about Long-term Risks |
Value Judgments about Model Reliability |
Value Judgments about Simplification of the Phenomena |
Value Judgments about Reliability of Sampling |
Value Judgments about Laboratory Predictions |
Value Judgments about Fractured, Unsaturated Media |
Value Judgments that Interpolations Are Acceptable |
Value Judgments that Human Error Is Not Significant |
Problems with Yucca Mountain versus Problems with Permanent Disposal |
Subjective Evaluations of Repository Risks / 5: |
Value Judgments that a Given Magnitude of Risk Is Acceptable |
Value Judgments that Risk Reductions Are Sufficient |
Value Judgments that Worst-case Hazards Are Not Credible |
Value Judgments that Average Risks Are Acceptable |
Value Judgments that More Recent Assessments Are More Reliable |
Value Judgments that Utilitarian Risk Theories Are Just |
Value Judgments about Single-site Studies |
Value Judgments that Full Liability Does Not Promote Safety |
Value Judgments that High-Level Waste Is as Safe as Ore |
Problematic Inferences in Assessing Repository Risks / 6: |
The Appeal to Ignorance |
Two-Valued Epistemic Logic and the Appeal to Ignorance |
Begging the Question |
The Expertise Inference |
The Linearity Inference |
The De Minimis Inference |
The Consent Inference |
Specious Accuracy |
The Inference of the Multiple Maximand |
Affirming the Consequent |
The Appeal to Authority |
Uncertainty: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal / 7: |
We Cannot Adequately Guarantee Yucca Mountain Safety |
Extensive, Nonquantifiable Uncertainty at Yucca Mountain Argues against Disposal |
Uncertainty and Permanent Disposal |
Uncertainty and Permanent Disposal: Other Countries |
Uncertainty and Permanent Disposal: Faulty Inferences |
Uncertainty and Permanent Disposal: An Objection |
Uncertainty and Permanent Disposal: Type-II Error |
Equity: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal / 8: |
Equity and Permanent Geological Disposal |
Equity and Permanent Geological Disposal: Objections Based on Utility |
Equity and Permanent Geological Disposal: Are There Duties to Future Generations? |
Consent and Permanent Disposal |
Practical and Legal Considerations against Disposal |
An Alternative to Permanent Geological Disposal / 9: |
Basic Principles |
The NMRS Option |
Historical Context |
Independent Technical and Review Committees |
A Lottery to Determine NMRS Rotations |
Regional and Temporary NMRS |
Public Defender for the Future |
Full Liability |
Compensation from the Beginning |
Negotiated Compensation |
A Public-legacy Trust |
Benefits of NMRS Facilities |
Objections to NMRS Facilities |
Is a Hundred-year NMRS More Expensive? |
Discounting Underestimates Repository Risks |
Does NMRS Unrealistically Seek Zero Risk? |
Would NMRS Burden the Future? |
Would NMRS Facilities Become De Facto Permanent? |
NMRS Uncertainties |
Do Several Sites for NMRS Create Too Much Anxiety? |
Does the Quantity of Waste Require Permanent Disposal? |
Notes |
Index of Names |
Index of Subjects |
Acknowledgments |
Preface |
The Riddle of Nuclear Waste / 1: |
The Status Quo: Promoting Permanent Disposal |
The Mistakes of the Past |
Summary and Overview |